Technische Universität Berlin
The cemento-dentine-junction
(CDJ) is a durable natural interface connecting root dentine with the cementum that
covers it. Though the CDJ connects two nanocomposites of mineralised-collagen-fibres
(reinforced by carbonated apatite - cAp nanocrystals), it contains much less
collagen [1], and more proteoglycans (Fig. 1a) than either tissue. The CDJ
hardly ever fails in vivo, resisting millions of chewing cycles, and
this is achieved without cells and with no known healing mechanisms. Such outstanding
resilience makes it an interesting role model for the design of cyclically
loaded interfaces [2,3].
In our
project within FOR 2804 “InterDent”, we investigate the structure and fatigue
behaviour of the CDJ, on mm-sized cementum-CDJ-dentine cuboids extracted from
the roots of freshly slaughtered pigs. We perform load-controlled compressive
micro-fatigue tests (frequency f = 5 Hz, Ringer’s solution, stress amplitude =
25 MPa or 50 MPa, maximum stress =
-3 MPa) until the force-displacement graphs lose 50 % of their
initial height, or to a maximum of N = 5x10E5 cycles,
whichever occurs first. All specimens exhibit initial softening followed by
hardening, which is at least partially explained by time-dependent deformation
mechanisms (Fig. 1b). Differing somewhat between different root regions and the
load sequence, a second, more extended softening peak is observed at N =
10E5. Imaging of the fatigued specimens by phase-contrast enhanced
micro-computed tomography (Anatomix @ synchrotron Soleil, Paris) and scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) reveal that fatigue cracks form and progress in dentine,
presumably leading to pronounced softening. Cracks are always diverted by the
CDJ but hardly ever traverse it (Fig. 1c). Further, nano-dynamic mechanical
analysis (nanoDMA) shows a lower storage modulus in dentine near the CDJ as
compared to regions further away from it (Fig. 1d). This property modification
may protect the CDJ during cyclic loading, despite a higher degree of
mineralisation and concomitant higher stiffness.
References
[1] KR Craig; JW Harrison, J Endod. 1993;19(7):339-347.
[2] S.P. Ho;
M. Balooch; S.J. Marshall; G.W. Marshall, J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;70(3):480-489.
[3] S.P. Ho;
R.M. Sulyanto; S.J. Marshall; G.W. Marschall, J Struct Biol. 2005;151(1):69-78.
Abstract
Erwerben Sie einen Zugang, um dieses Dokument anzusehen.
Poster
Erwerben Sie einen Zugang, um dieses Dokument anzusehen.
© 2026